Nurse Home | Advertise  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for LPNs RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Current Issue

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified LPNs


Features

When Tattoos Become Taboo

View Comments (4)Print ArticleEmail Article

Tattoos aren't just a modern fascination. They've had a long lineage throughout the ages. In fact, the earliest markings were found on the body of an Iceman dating from 5,200 BC.

Today, 24 percent of Americans, ages 18 to 50, are tattooed, according to a 2006 study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. That's almost one in four. A 2003 Harris Interactive Poll found that 17 percent of these Americans regretted having a tattoo.

As tattoo removal technology advances, the procedure is becoming more affordable. As such, tattoo removal is a service providers can easily integrate into their practices.

A Look at Tattooing
The most common method of tattooing is preformed with an electric tattoo machine. This device inserts ink into the skin via a group of needles, which rapidly place ink through the epidermis to the papillary dermis. Ideally, this procedure is done under sanitary conditions.

Amateur tattoos tend to be unsanitary. Someone simply places a needle dipped in ink or dye and inserts it into the skin. Best examples of these can be seen on gang members and prisoners.

During the tattoo process, the ink particles become imbedded into the skin where they're placed. But many particles have a migratory pattern after intradermal injection, traveling to lymph nodes. Ink depth and density are inconsistent and depend on the artist's skill level, although a study conducted by Lea and Pawlowski concluded that this didn't appear to affect ink dispersion in the epidermis and dermis.1

The ink particles initially appear in the epidermis, epidermal-dermal junction and papillary dermis, during which time an inflammatory process occurs. Ink particles are ingested by phagocytic cells and eventually settle into the deeper dermis by the action of phagocytic cells, which may make the tattoo dull and blurry. Eventually, some of the ink migrates into the regional lymph nodes, which act as a filter to help remove ink particles.2,3

In the past, treatment modalities have run the gamut from physical to thermal modalities of destruction. Unfortunately, these methods tend to produce scarring by destroying both tattooed and non-tattooed tissue.

Of removal methods, salabrasion is one of the earliest. It entails removing the superficial dermis by abrading the skin with course granule sodium chloride (table salt) and a moist gauze pad. A salt poultice is then left on the wound for 24 hours. This procedure can produce pain and scarring, with pigment still remaining on the skin.

Another method, dermabrasion, removes the surface of the epidermis and stratum corneum. A small electric diamond fraise wheel or wire brush abrades the skin and essentially "sands" the skin off. This method tends to be bloody and painful. It also produces scarring with residual tattoo pigment.

Laser Tattoo Removal
In the 1970s, the carbon dioxide laser (CO2) and argon laser were first used to remove tattoos. The CO2 and argon laser removed tattoo pigment through direct tissue vaporization, thermal necrosis of adjacent tissue and loss of pigment in the exudative healing process.4 As with other methods of thermal destruction, the same risks existed with CO2 and argon lasers, including pain, scarring and hypo-pigmentaion of tissue.

The Q-switched laser (operating in the nanosecond range: one billionth of a second) has revolutionized tattoo removal, making scarless removal a possibility. These lasers target the tattoo pigment in the dermis, fragmenting it into particles. These particles are then released into the extracellular space and eliminated. Some particles are only partially removed through the crusting of the epidermis after treatment.4

The four wavelengths that remove tattoos are the Q-switched ruby (694 nm), the Q-switched alexandrite (755 nm) and the Q-switched Nd:YAG (532 nm and 1064 nm). Anderson and Parrish's principle of selective photothermolysis explains why lasers remove tattoo ink. The primary principle states that by choosing an appropriate wavelength (532 nm, 694 nm, 755 nm and/or 1064 nm) we can match the color of the tattoo particle. By choosing the pulse duration (nanoseconds), we can match the size of the tattoo particle. And with fluence, we can select the energy needed to explode the tattoo particle.

As a result, thermal injury is confined to a target (tattoo ink) while avoiding nonspecific thermal injury to the surrounding tissue.4 The type of laser to remove the tattoo depends on the color of the ink and surrounding skin pigmentation. Specific wavelengths destroy specific tattoo ink colors, while the competition from melanin in the epidermis decreases as wavelengths increase. Therefore, the longer the wavelength, the less likely depigmentation of the epidermis will occur.

The number of treatments to remove tattoos can vary greatly depending on color, depth and amount of tattoo pigment, as well as the person's ability to phagocytize the tattoo pigment. It also depends on whether the tattoo is an amateur or professional one and whether it has one to two layers of pigment on it.

The easiest colors to remove are black, green and blue because lasers are specifically tuned to these wavelength colors. All other colors are more difficult because we don't have lasers that are tuned to these color wavelengths.

The ability for the ink to absorb energy is a key concept. An unpublished study by a laser manufacturer in 1991 determined reflectance spectra for 17 different tattoo ink colors and six different variants of black ink. The company found that different colors of tattoo ink exhibited an optimal absorption laser wavelength.

For example, the ideal absorption wavelength for blue and green ink is 625 nm to 755 nm. Therefore, the Q-switched ruby (695 nm) or Q-switched alexandrite (755 nm) laser is the best choice for removing these colors. This is why successful tattoo removal often requires multiple lasers with different wavelengths.

On average, removing an amateur tattoo can take three to six sessions; a professional tattoo can take well over 10 treatments sessions.

New tattoos that are black usually require fewer treatments.In addition, they're easier to remove because the ink is superficial and has a strong absorption quality. Tattoos that are older (20 or more years), have multiple colors and are re-inked tend to be more challenging. Moreover, the patient's cellular ability to mobilize ink fragments and remove them affect the success of removal. Sometimes, completely removing the tattoo isn't possible, with the best result being a "ghost" tattoo--light shadow images of the original.

Ideally, treatments are spaced four to eight weeks apart. We've found that treatment intervals that occur less than one month apart don't accelerate tattoo removal. In fact, they can potentially interfere with the healing process, resulting in unwanted -tissue reactions, such as hypopigmentation or scarring.5

Initially, the ink pigment may show significant lightening on the first one to two treatments, then taper off. Others may be slower to lose color. This may be due to the person's ability to mobilize macrophages to remove the pigment fragments. As would be expected, the more superficial and less-dense the ink pigment, the fewer treatments required to lighten the tattoo.


When Tattoos Become Taboo

 Next >
1 | 2

 

I have been an LPN since 1977. I got my first tattoo when I worked in a nursing home in 1991 at the age of 34. I have since added 10 more and plan to add my 12th on vacation next week. I can hide every tattoo I have, if I choose. I have never had an employer tell me to cover them. Two (soon three) are on my forearms/wrist, two are on my calf/ankle, and all but one of the others (it's on my LLQ) are always covered unless I wear a tank top. And I am not done getting them. They are all butterflies or flowers and are 3x4" and smaller. Removing them is never going to be an option. They are representations of who I am, and several symbolize people that are/were important in my life.

Jean Albertson,  LPNMarch 18, 2009
Jackson, NJ



I enjoy my tattoos very much; I have a complete back piece. My clients and their family members don't know this though. I have always felt that tattoos are a personal expression and I choose the people I share them with, especially my employer.
This colorful book isn't judged by her cover.

Christine Ouellet,  LPNMarch 05, 2009
Norwich, CT



I have a tattoo on my right upper shoulder. I got it when I was 38 years old. I have been a nurse for 20 years and am fully aware of some preconceived prejudices against tattoos. I elected to get the tattoo in a place not visible to others in the workplace to maintain professionalism. This goes along with untraditional piercings. I have no problem with tattoos, they are an artistic expression of individualism (or in my case, a pre-middle-age crisis), and I know several excellent nurses who have tattoos, piercings and other forms of self-expression.

Nancy March 04, 2009
IN



Read all comments (4) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

 

Search Jobs

Zip

Go